[Opinion] Wish I were Freddie Blay

I fell in love, not with Law, but with lawyers as far back as secondary school. The first lawyer who swept me off my feet was the sensational Perry Mason, a fictional American criminal defence lawyer in works of detective fiction.

In real life, there are six Ghanaian lawyers I fell in love with. In the mid-to-late 1980s, Gyeke Darko, as Director of Public Prosecutions, was a thorn in the flesh of lawyers representing coup plotters at treason trials. My, what brains! Like Tsatsu Tsikata, he could reel off references from legal records, straight from memory, even as opposing lawyers struggled to get past one sentence.

Once upon a time, it was said that if you wanted guaranteed success in court, carry your case to Sam Okudzeto. Legal wizard, if there was one!
These three I have admired from afar.

Up close, I will take my case to Ace Anan Ankomah and Captain Nkrabeah Effah Darteh any day. If I haven’t added Freddie Blay, it is because he branched off into politics, and I generally would not touch a politician with a long pole.

In those late 1980s/early 90s Freddie’s shimmering plush Mercedes Benz turned all eyes. The gossip was that it was a trophy from a legal battle he had recently won.

In all my life, those I admire are gods to me, impeccable in judgment.

So you can imagine my shock when I first read that Nkabreah and Freddie would represent the Chinese woman accused of engaging in galamsey.

Code of conduct

First of all, I am aware of what the code of conduct for the Legal Profession says: that a lawyer, “unless prevented by professional conduct, rules or by law, shall be free to take on or reject a case”.

In the law profession, therefore, there is no sinner. Even murderers deserve legal representation. In the eyes of God, Effah Darteh and Freddie Blay have committed no sin for accepting to defend a human being.

Even when I asked myself whether a National Democratic Congress (NDC) lawyer would agree to defend a New Patriotic Party (NPP) activist in court, my answer was, yes. In 2014, at the height of NPP-NDC animosity, when the two parties wished the other dead, guess who represented Jerry John Rawlings (RIP), founder of NDC and first NDC President in the Fourth Republic in court.

It was Atta Akyea, NPP Member of Parliament (MP) for Abuakwa South and former Minister for Works and Housing. The former President wanted the courts to place an injunction on a book written by Professor Danso-Boafo because it contained secrets harmful to Rawlings’s presidency.

Matter

So, in the current Freddie Blay-Effah Dartey matter, what I hear from the public is not professional misconduct. I hear public opprobrium. It is the expression of shock by a public who have not recovered from a crime against the humanity of Ghanaians, amounting to mass murder, to wit, poisoning the people’s water source.

In their righteous anger, the voice of the people is not that the Chinese galamseyers do not deserve legal representation; it is that this representation is coming from two no ordinary lawyers who are an embodiment of a political party which, in power, has declared war on illegal mining.

(Effah Darteh was a one-time MP and Deputy Minister for the Interior. Freddie Blay has been an MP/Deputy Speaker of Parliament and, until a few months ago, Chairman of the NPP).

The people’s concern is not about the law and lawyers’ rights; they are drawing attention to the optics of the situation, the way in which the event or course of action is perceived by the public. To Ghanaians, a galamseyer’s sin stinks in the nostrils of God and everyone connected with a sinner is a sinner themselves. Purely optics.

Lawyers, like doctors, swear an oath to defend or care for everybody who makes a call on their professional service. Unlike doctors, however, lawyers can pick and choose; they are not bound to take cases from every human being who comes through the door.

The question Ghanaians are asking is, will a lawyer, in the name of profit, defend someone accused of killing their (lawyer’s) mother?

It is routine in Ghana that lawyers turn down instructions some of the time.

Know why I am writing with such desperation? It is out of fear of what Freddie and Effah are capable of doing, even as individuals, to the case. Their combined brains are deadly for any legal foe. Imagine that they win!

Freddie Blay is within his rights to take up any cases. I would have rejoiced at his chance to enter history as the lawyer who, for the good of 30 million compatriots, turned down the instruction of a human being who required his legal service.

Freddie Blay says his law firm is handling the three other Chinese nationals and the Vietnamese and not the woman. My plea to Freddie is for him to remove completely the faintest association of his name with the case, in the larger interest of Ghana. If the NPP cares about its reputation and 2024, they should, by now, be making frantic efforts to lift the burden off their former chairman by offering to meet his law firm halfway to avoid total loss of income. It’s an individual call.

Source: Enimil Ashon

The writer is Executive Director,Centre for Communication and Culture. E-mail: ashonenimil@gmail.com

Read Previous

Labour commission, striking MMT staff  to meet today

Read Next

Statistical Service to begin nationwide health survey on October 17

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

WEEKLY PROGRAMME

We have exclusive TV Programmes made just for you

Interested In some specific programme updates and first hand information on our presenters?… Fill the form below