Subtle tensions are escalating within the architectural community in Ghana as the Foster Osae-Akonnor led- Executive Council of the Ghana Institute of Architects (GIA) faces criticism from its membership over its unilateral decision to increase membership fees by a 100%. The move, announced on December 12, 2023, has drawn sharp opposition from member architects across the country, sparking concerns about transparency and accountability within the institute.
Starting from this year, associate members are expected to pay a GHS 1,000.00 as annual subscription as against the previous GHS 500.00. Graduate architects are also expected to pay GHS 500.00 against the previous GHS 250.00. This sudden escalation has prompted widespread questioning amongst members of the professional body about the justification behind such a significant hike and its potential repercussions for the future of architecture in Ghana.
The architectural community is expressing frustration over what they perceive as a lack of accountability regarding the utilization of funds collected by the GIA. Many practitioners feel that the Institute has shown little concern for the challenges faced by architects in the country, leaving the architectural practice in Ghana struggling amidst low patronage.
Some concerned architects, who spoke to our media house, voiced their concerns, stating, “This sudden and substantial fee hike is not only unjustifiable but also detrimental to the growth of the architectural profession in our country. It discourages young talents from pursuing a career in architecture and puts financial strain on those who are already contributing to the field.”
The executives have failed to present a budget to members detailing income and expenditure and this increase could not be substantiated.
Another also argues that the past and present GIA executives have done little to improve the welfare of architects and graduates in the professional space and hence can not levy members
Critics argue that the abrupt nature of the fee increase, without adequate consultation with affected stakeholders, raises questions about transparency and accountability within the GIA. Calls for more clarity on how the additional funds will be utilized and for a reconsideration of the fee structure are gaining momentum among dissenting voices.
It must also be noted that in a recent legal case which was initiated by two architects, the Human Rights Court ruled that the payment of dues to the GIA can only be voluntary and that payment of renewal fees to the state regulator- Architects Registration Council shall suffice for qualification for practice.
